The objectives of the registered professional environmental engineer certification cases review were to understand the quality and defects of certification processed by certified engineers. The results may be used to guide the improvement of certification of engineers to upgrade the quality of certified Professional Environmental Engineers. Also, Started in 2006, the operation of registered professional engineering organizations have been reviewed. The key points focused on work drafts inspection. This year, the review of the operation of registered professional engineering organizations found that the most frequent which made up defect was that " the certification files had not been declared accurately ", around 75% of the total defects. Followed was " the original working manuscript did not have execution seal and signature ", around 60%. The results suggested that there shall be continuous promotion of "Professional Environmental Engineer Certification Regulations." For the review of water pollution sites, the most frequent defects were that "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 70%. The next frequent defect was "unreasonable treatment unit design parameters and operational parameters", around 45%. The most frequent defect appeared on stationary source onsite review was also "in the application documents, texts and values were not filled in, incorrect or inconsistent", around 90%. Followed by "Incorrect calculation of air pollutants release quantities, such as the use of incorrect equations, and discharge pipe exit height did not calculated based on ground heights", around 30%. In addition, to effectively manage the professional engineer certification process, this program established the Registered Professional Environmental Engineer management information system. Through an Internet database, information was provided to every level of environmental control management organizations to make available basic information on professional engineers, including their certification status, review results, and award and punishment received, to improve the management of professional engineer certifications.

certification, review, management information system